CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift. / Estrada-Carpenter, Vicente; Papovich, Casey; Momcheva, Ivelina; Brammer, Gabriel; Simons, Raymond; Bridge, Joanna; Cleri, Nikko J.; Ferguson, Henry; Finkelstein, Steven L.; Giavalisco, Mauro; Jung, Intae; Matharu, Jasleen; Trump, Jonathan R.; Weiner, Benjamin.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 898, No. 2, 171, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Estrada-Carpenter, V, Papovich, C, Momcheva, I, Brammer, G, Simons, R, Bridge, J, Cleri, NJ, Ferguson, H, Finkelstein, SL, Giavalisco, M, Jung, I, Matharu, J, Trump, JR & Weiner, B 2020, 'CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 898, no. 2, 171. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba004

APA

Estrada-Carpenter, V., Papovich, C., Momcheva, I., Brammer, G., Simons, R., Bridge, J., Cleri, N. J., Ferguson, H., Finkelstein, S. L., Giavalisco, M., Jung, I., Matharu, J., Trump, J. R., & Weiner, B. (2020). CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift. Astrophysical Journal, 898(2), [171]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba004

Vancouver

Estrada-Carpenter V, Papovich C, Momcheva I, Brammer G, Simons R, Bridge J et al. CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift. Astrophysical Journal. 2020;898(2). 171. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba004

Author

Estrada-Carpenter, Vicente ; Papovich, Casey ; Momcheva, Ivelina ; Brammer, Gabriel ; Simons, Raymond ; Bridge, Joanna ; Cleri, Nikko J. ; Ferguson, Henry ; Finkelstein, Steven L. ; Giavalisco, Mauro ; Jung, Intae ; Matharu, Jasleen ; Trump, Jonathan R. ; Weiner, Benjamin. / CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 898, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{078307d09b654e93ad40a39175aa2e9b,
title = "CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift",
abstract = "The origin of the correlations between mass, morphology, quenched fraction, and formation history in galaxies is difficult to define, primarily due to the uncertainties in galaxy star formation histories (SFHs). SFHs are better constrained for higher redshift galaxies, observed closer to their formation and quenching epochs. Here we use nonparametric SFHs and a nested sampling method to derive constraints on the formation and quenching timescales of quiescent galaxies at 0.7 < z 7 < 2.5. We model deep HST grism spectroscopy and photometry from the CLEAR (CANDELS L50 Emission at Reionization) survey. The galaxy formation redshifts, z50 (defined as the point where they had formed 50% of their stellar mass) range from z50 ∼ 2 (shortly prior to the observed epoch) up to z50 ≂ 5 - 8. We find that early formation redshifts are correlated with high stellar-mass surface densities, logS1 M kpc- < 10.25 ( 2) Σ, where U1 is the stellar mass within 1 Qpkpc (proper kpc). Quiescent galaxies with the highest stellar-mass surface density, logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ0 , show a minimum formation redshift: all such objects in our sample have z50 > 2.9. Quiescent galaxies with lower surface density, logS1 M kpc- = 9.5 - 10.25 (2) Σ0, show a range of formation epochs (z50 Σ 1.58), implying these galaxies experienced a range of formation and assembly histories. We argue that the surface density threshold logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ uniquely identifies galaxies that formed in the first few Gyr after the big bang, and we discuss the implications this has for galaxy formation models.",
author = "Vicente Estrada-Carpenter and Casey Papovich and Ivelina Momcheva and Gabriel Brammer and Raymond Simons and Joanna Bridge and Cleri, {Nikko J.} and Henry Ferguson and Finkelstein, {Steven L.} and Mauro Giavalisco and Intae Jung and Jasleen Matharu and Trump, {Jonathan R.} and Benjamin Weiner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/aba004",
language = "English",
volume = "898",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "Institute of Physics Publishing, Inc",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - CLEAR. II. Evidence for Early Formation of the Most Compact Quiescent Galaxies at High Redshift

AU - Estrada-Carpenter, Vicente

AU - Papovich, Casey

AU - Momcheva, Ivelina

AU - Brammer, Gabriel

AU - Simons, Raymond

AU - Bridge, Joanna

AU - Cleri, Nikko J.

AU - Ferguson, Henry

AU - Finkelstein, Steven L.

AU - Giavalisco, Mauro

AU - Jung, Intae

AU - Matharu, Jasleen

AU - Trump, Jonathan R.

AU - Weiner, Benjamin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The origin of the correlations between mass, morphology, quenched fraction, and formation history in galaxies is difficult to define, primarily due to the uncertainties in galaxy star formation histories (SFHs). SFHs are better constrained for higher redshift galaxies, observed closer to their formation and quenching epochs. Here we use nonparametric SFHs and a nested sampling method to derive constraints on the formation and quenching timescales of quiescent galaxies at 0.7 < z 7 < 2.5. We model deep HST grism spectroscopy and photometry from the CLEAR (CANDELS L50 Emission at Reionization) survey. The galaxy formation redshifts, z50 (defined as the point where they had formed 50% of their stellar mass) range from z50 ∼ 2 (shortly prior to the observed epoch) up to z50 ≂ 5 - 8. We find that early formation redshifts are correlated with high stellar-mass surface densities, logS1 M kpc- < 10.25 ( 2) Σ, where U1 is the stellar mass within 1 Qpkpc (proper kpc). Quiescent galaxies with the highest stellar-mass surface density, logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ0 , show a minimum formation redshift: all such objects in our sample have z50 > 2.9. Quiescent galaxies with lower surface density, logS1 M kpc- = 9.5 - 10.25 (2) Σ0, show a range of formation epochs (z50 Σ 1.58), implying these galaxies experienced a range of formation and assembly histories. We argue that the surface density threshold logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ uniquely identifies galaxies that formed in the first few Gyr after the big bang, and we discuss the implications this has for galaxy formation models.

AB - The origin of the correlations between mass, morphology, quenched fraction, and formation history in galaxies is difficult to define, primarily due to the uncertainties in galaxy star formation histories (SFHs). SFHs are better constrained for higher redshift galaxies, observed closer to their formation and quenching epochs. Here we use nonparametric SFHs and a nested sampling method to derive constraints on the formation and quenching timescales of quiescent galaxies at 0.7 < z 7 < 2.5. We model deep HST grism spectroscopy and photometry from the CLEAR (CANDELS L50 Emission at Reionization) survey. The galaxy formation redshifts, z50 (defined as the point where they had formed 50% of their stellar mass) range from z50 ∼ 2 (shortly prior to the observed epoch) up to z50 ≂ 5 - 8. We find that early formation redshifts are correlated with high stellar-mass surface densities, logS1 M kpc- < 10.25 ( 2) Σ, where U1 is the stellar mass within 1 Qpkpc (proper kpc). Quiescent galaxies with the highest stellar-mass surface density, logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ0 , show a minimum formation redshift: all such objects in our sample have z50 > 2.9. Quiescent galaxies with lower surface density, logS1 M kpc- = 9.5 - 10.25 (2) Σ0, show a range of formation epochs (z50 Σ 1.58), implying these galaxies experienced a range of formation and assembly histories. We argue that the surface density threshold logS1 M kpc- > 10.25 (2) Σ uniquely identifies galaxies that formed in the first few Gyr after the big bang, and we discuss the implications this has for galaxy formation models.

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aba004

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aba004

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85090447728

VL - 898

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

M1 - 171

ER -

ID: 270667969