How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy: The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy : The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting. / Lower, Sidney; Narayanan, Desika; Leja, Joel; Johnson, Benjamin D.; Conroy, Charlie; Dave, Romeel.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 904, No. 1, 33, 19.11.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lower, S, Narayanan, D, Leja, J, Johnson, BD, Conroy, C & Dave, R 2020, 'How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy: The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 904, no. 1, 33. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

APA

Lower, S., Narayanan, D., Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Dave, R. (2020). How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy: The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting. Astrophysical Journal, 904(1), [33]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

Vancouver

Lower S, Narayanan D, Leja J, Johnson BD, Conroy C, Dave R. How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy: The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting. Astrophysical Journal. 2020 Nov 19;904(1). 33. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

Author

Lower, Sidney ; Narayanan, Desika ; Leja, Joel ; Johnson, Benjamin D. ; Conroy, Charlie ; Dave, Romeel. / How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy : The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 904, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{9551ccd6852e42409ef238f2402e4123,
title = "How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy: The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting",
abstract = "The primary method for inferring the stellar mass (M-*) of a galaxy is through spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. However, the technique rests on assumptions such as the galaxy star formation history (SFH) and dust attenuation law that can severely impact the accuracy of derived physical properties from SED modeling. Here we examine the effect that the assumed SFH has on the stellar properties inferred from SED fitting by ground-truthing them against mock observations of high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic galaxy formation simulations. Classically, SFHs are modeled with simplified parameterized functional forms, but these forms are unlikely to capture the true diversity of galaxy SFHs and may impose systematic biases with underreported uncertainties on results. We demonstrate that flexible nonparametric SFHs outperform traditional parametric forms in capturing variations in galaxy SFHs and, as a result, lead to significantly improved stellar masses in SED fitting. We find a decrease in the average bias of 0.4 dex with a delayed-tau model to a bias under 0.1 dex for the nonparametric model, though this is heavily dependent on the choice of prior for the nonparametric model. Similarly, using nonparametric SFHs in SED fitting results in increased accuracy in recovered galaxy star formation rates and stellar ages.",
keywords = "Astronomy data modeling, Hydrodynamical simulations, Stellar masses, Galaxy properties, Spectral energy distribution, Radiative transfer simulations, PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES, INFRARED-EMISSION, INTERSTELLAR DUST, SPECTRA, GAS, UNCERTAINTIES, EVOLUTION, DISTRIBUTIONS, PROPAGATION, POPULATIONS",
author = "Sidney Lower and Desika Narayanan and Joel Leja and Johnson, {Benjamin D.} and Charlie Conroy and Romeel Dave",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "19",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7",
language = "English",
volume = "904",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "Institute of Physics Publishing, Inc",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Well Can We Measure the Stellar Mass of a Galaxy

T2 - The Impact of the Assumed Star Formation History Model in SED Fitting

AU - Lower, Sidney

AU - Narayanan, Desika

AU - Leja, Joel

AU - Johnson, Benjamin D.

AU - Conroy, Charlie

AU - Dave, Romeel

PY - 2020/11/19

Y1 - 2020/11/19

N2 - The primary method for inferring the stellar mass (M-*) of a galaxy is through spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. However, the technique rests on assumptions such as the galaxy star formation history (SFH) and dust attenuation law that can severely impact the accuracy of derived physical properties from SED modeling. Here we examine the effect that the assumed SFH has on the stellar properties inferred from SED fitting by ground-truthing them against mock observations of high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic galaxy formation simulations. Classically, SFHs are modeled with simplified parameterized functional forms, but these forms are unlikely to capture the true diversity of galaxy SFHs and may impose systematic biases with underreported uncertainties on results. We demonstrate that flexible nonparametric SFHs outperform traditional parametric forms in capturing variations in galaxy SFHs and, as a result, lead to significantly improved stellar masses in SED fitting. We find a decrease in the average bias of 0.4 dex with a delayed-tau model to a bias under 0.1 dex for the nonparametric model, though this is heavily dependent on the choice of prior for the nonparametric model. Similarly, using nonparametric SFHs in SED fitting results in increased accuracy in recovered galaxy star formation rates and stellar ages.

AB - The primary method for inferring the stellar mass (M-*) of a galaxy is through spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling. However, the technique rests on assumptions such as the galaxy star formation history (SFH) and dust attenuation law that can severely impact the accuracy of derived physical properties from SED modeling. Here we examine the effect that the assumed SFH has on the stellar properties inferred from SED fitting by ground-truthing them against mock observations of high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic galaxy formation simulations. Classically, SFHs are modeled with simplified parameterized functional forms, but these forms are unlikely to capture the true diversity of galaxy SFHs and may impose systematic biases with underreported uncertainties on results. We demonstrate that flexible nonparametric SFHs outperform traditional parametric forms in capturing variations in galaxy SFHs and, as a result, lead to significantly improved stellar masses in SED fitting. We find a decrease in the average bias of 0.4 dex with a delayed-tau model to a bias under 0.1 dex for the nonparametric model, though this is heavily dependent on the choice of prior for the nonparametric model. Similarly, using nonparametric SFHs in SED fitting results in increased accuracy in recovered galaxy star formation rates and stellar ages.

KW - Astronomy data modeling

KW - Hydrodynamical simulations

KW - Stellar masses

KW - Galaxy properties

KW - Spectral energy distribution

KW - Radiative transfer simulations

KW - PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES

KW - INFRARED-EMISSION

KW - INTERSTELLAR DUST

KW - SPECTRA

KW - GAS

KW - UNCERTAINTIES

KW - EVOLUTION

KW - DISTRIBUTIONS

KW - PROPAGATION

KW - POPULATIONS

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 904

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1

M1 - 33

ER -

ID: 252832743